In MarcTec, LLC v. Johnson & Johnson, No. 2010-1285, (Fed. Cir. Jan. 3, 2012), the Federal Circuit affirmed the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois’ award of $3,873,865.01 in attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and $809,788.02 in expert fees under its inherent authority to award reasonable expert fees in excess of the § 285 statutory limit. On appeal to the Federal Circuit, patent holder-plaintiff, MarcTec LLC (“MarcTec”), argued that the case was not “exceptional” under § 285, and that the district court abused its discretion in awarding expert fees. The Federal Circuit nevertheless affirmed. Read more...
Patent Law Blog
MarcTec v. Johnson & Johnson: Exceptional Cases & the Inherit Authority to Award Reasonable Expert Fees
submitted by Benjamin E. Hoopes on Monday, January 09, 2012
1
Recent Posts
- In re Google: eDiscovery and Privileged Communications
- MarcTec v. Johnson & Johnson: Exceptional Cases & the Inherit Authority to Award Reasonable Expert Fees
- Typhoon Touch Technologies v. Dell: Risks of Functional Claiming
- Ultramercial v. Hulu: The Federal Circuit Continues to Grapple with Computer Programs as Patentable Subject Matter
- CyberSource v. Retail Decisions: Computer Programs as Patentable Subject Matter
- CBT Flint Partners v. Return Path: Post-Issuance Changes
- Retractable Technologies v. Becton, Dickinson: Claim Differentiaiton and Written Description
- Therasense: Redefining the Intent and Materiality Elements to Prove Inequitable Conduct
- Global Tech v. SEB: Induced Infringement Under the Doctrine of Willful Blindness
- McKesson v. Epic: Federal Circuit Affirms Non-Infringement Based on Divided Infringement Analysis
